The Journal of Urology
Volume 164, Issue 4 , Pages 1259-1264, October 2000

IN VITRO COMPARISON OF SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY MACHINES

From the Division of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio and Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, and Division of Urology and Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine and DePaul Health Center, St. Louis, Missouri

Accepted 26 May 2000.

Purpose

We tested the hypothesis that shock wave lithotripsy machines vary in the ability to fragment stones to small size.

Materials and Methods

Calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate, cystine and magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate calculi were fragmented in vitro with the 22 kV. Dornier HM3, § 20 kV. Storz Modulith SLX, , 15.6 kV. Siemens Lithostar C, 24 kV. Medstone STS-T, ** 26 kV. HealthTronics LithoTron 160, †† 20 kV. Dornier Doli § and 22.5 kV. Medispec Econolith ‡‡ lithotriptors. Stones were given 500 or 2,000 shocks, or the Food and Drug Administration limit. Post-lithotripsy fragment size was characterized using sequential sieves and compared.

Results

Stone mass was statistically similar in the cohorts (p >0.94). Fragment size decreased as the number of shocks increased when the machine and stone composition were constant. Magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate calculi were completely fragmented by all devices. At Food and Drug Administration treatment limits the mean incidence per device of calcium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate, calcium oxalate monohydrate, cystine and magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate stones rendered into fragments greater than 2 mm. was 0% for the HM3, Modulith SLX and Lithostar C, 10% for the STS-T, 3% for the LithoTron 160, 29% for the Doli and 18% for the Econolith (p = 0.04); 0% for the HM3, Modulith SLX, Lithostar C, STS-T and LithoTron 160, 4% for the Doli and 9% for the Econolith (p = 0.15); 1% for the HM3, 0% for the Modulith SLX, 1% for the Lithostar C, 10% for the STS-T, 14% for the LithoTron 160, 3% for the Doli and 9% for the Econolith (p = 0.44); and 1% for the HM3, 0% for the Modulith SLX, 1% for the Lithostar C, 10% for the STS-T, 14% for the LithoTron 160, 3% for the Doli and 9% for the Econolith (p = 0.44), respectively.

Conclusions

Shock wave lithotriptors vary in fragmentation ability. The HM3, Modulith SLX and Lithostar C machines yield smaller fragments than other machines.

Key Words:  urinary calculi , urinary tract , lithotripsy , outcome assessment (health care)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 
  • § Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia.
  •  Storz Medical, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.
  •  Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., Iselin, New Jersey.
  • ** Medstone International, Inc., Aliso Viejo, California.
  • †† HealthTronics, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
  • ‡‡ Medispec, Montgomery Village, Maryland.

 Supported by grants from Dornier, HealthTronics, Storz, Medispec and Medstone.

PII: S0022-5347(05)67151-0

The Journal of Urology
Volume 164, Issue 4 , Pages 1259-1264, October 2000