The Journal of Urology
Volume 167, Issue 5 , Pages 2111-2112 , May 2002

Effects of Circumcision on Male Sexual Function: Debunking a Myth?

,Accepted 21 November 2001.

REFERENCES 

  1. Committee on Fetus and Newborn: Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision . Pediatrics . 1975;56:610
  2. Herzog L . Urinary tract infections and circumcision: a case control study . Am J Dis Child . 1987;143:348
  3. Laumann EO , Masi CM , Zuckerman MA . Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects and sexual practice . JAMA . 1997;277:1052
  4. Dunsmuir WD , Gordon EM . The history of circumcision . BJU Int . 1999;83:1
  5. O’Leary MP , Fowler FJ , Lenderking WR , et al.   A brief male sexual function inventory for urology . Urology . 1995;46:697
  6. Masters WH , Johnson VE . Human Sexual Response . Boston: Little Brown; 1966;
  7. Goodwin W . Uncircumcision: a technique for plastic reconstruction of a prepuce after circumcision . J Urol . 1990;144:1203
  8. Rosen R . Sexual function assessment in the male: physiological and self-report measures . Int J Imp Res . 1998;10:59

PII: S0022-5347(05)65097-5

The Journal of Urology
Volume 167, Issue 5 , Pages 2111-2112 , May 2002