The Journal of Urology
Volume 170, Issue 3 , Pages 823-827, September 2003

Pain Sensitization in Male Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Why Are Symptoms so Difficult to Treat?

  • CLAIRE C. YANG

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Department of Urology, Box 356510, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6510 (telephone: 206-543-3640; FAX: 206-543-3272).
  • ,
  • JAY C. LEE

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Bayer, Pfizer, Lilly and Janssen Ortho.
  • ,
  • BRENDA G. KROMM
  • ,
  • MARCIA A. CIOL
  • ,
  • RICHARD E. BERGER

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Cennapharm and Lilly/ICOS.

From the Departments of Urology (CCY, JCL, BGK, REB) and Rehabilitation Medicine (MAC), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Accepted 21 March 2003.

ABSTRACT 

Purpose

Male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is a chronic and debilitating symptom complex, and inconsistent outcomes of antibiotic and anti-inflammatory treatments have created an interest in investigating the neurological mechanisms of CPPS pain. Because chronic pelvic pain likely results in hyperexcitability of dorsal horn neurons, ie central sensitization, thermal algometry may be useful in the assessment of CPPS. We evaluated men with and without CPPS to determine if there were differences between the 2 groups in their responses to noxious heat stimuli.

Materials and Methods

We recruited 66 healthy men without CPPS and 36 men with a history of CPPS for the study. Mean age of CPPS subjects was 43.1 years (range 18 to 62) and mean age of controls was 35.1 (range 21 to 61). All subjects with pain completed a National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. We conducted thermal sensory tests with a small thermode programmed to deliver 2 series of 4 rapid bursts of noxious heat stimuli to the perineum and the anterior thigh. The subjects reported sensation on a computerized visual analog scale (COVAS) with a manual sliding lever. The average peak COVAS values and time to peak values from thigh and perineum of each series of thermal bursts were compared between CPPS and controls.

Results

The mean pain score on questionnaires was 9.7 (4 or greater indicating significant pain), mean urinary score was 4.7 (range 0 to 10) and mean quality of life impact score was 7.3 (range 3 to 13). Compared to controls men with CPPS reported higher mean peak COVAS values in the perineum. There was no difference between groups in the peak COVAS value on the thigh.

Conclusions

Men with CPPS have altered heat sensation/pain sensitization in the perineum compared to controls. This finding is another that supports the resemblance of CPPS to other chronic pain syndromes and may help explain why CPPS is often refractory to treatment. Further investigations into male CPPS should focus on the mechanisms inducing and maintaining pain in an effort to treat this condition effectively.

Key Words:  prostatitis , pelvic pain , hyperalgesia , sensory thresholds

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a grant from the Paul G. Allen Foundation for Medical Research.Study received human subjects review committee approval.

PII: S0022-5347(05)63241-7

doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000082710.47402.03

The Journal of Urology
Volume 170, Issue 3 , Pages 823-827, September 2003