The Journal of Urology
Volume 172, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages 1614-1616, October 2004

ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT WITH DEXTRANOMER/HYALURONIC ACID FOR COMPLEX CASES OF VESICOURETERAL REFLUX

  • MARCOS PEREZ-BRAYFIELD
  • ,
  • ANDREW J. KIRSCH

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: 1901 Century Blvd., Suite 14, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (telephone: 404-320-7008; FAX: 404-320-1912)
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Q-Med
  • ,
  • TERRY W. HENSLE

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Q-Med
  • ,
  • MARTIN A. KOYLE

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Bayer, Mentor, Q-Med, Alza and Cook
  • ,
  • PETER FURNESS

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Q-Med
  • ,
  • HAL C. SCHERZ

From the Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (MP-B, AJK, HCS), Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York (TWH), and The Children's Hospital, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado (MAK, PF)

ABSTRACT 

Purpose:

The surgical correction of primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is highly successful. This success decreases in more complex cases and often involves reoperation and increased morbidity. We present our experience with the use of subureteral injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) in complex cases of vesicoureteral reflux in which open surgery would have been indicated.

Materials and Methods:

Between October 2001 and July 2003, 72 patients 9 months to 31 years old (mean age 5.6 years) underwent subureteral injection of Dx/HA for complex VUR at our institutions. Dx/HA was injected submucosally within the intramural ureter (modified STING) in most cases. A guidewire was used to manipulate the ureteral orifice and a retrograde ureterogram was used to delineate the anatomy in selected cases. The average volume of injected material was measured for each ureter. Renal sonography was performed to determine if hydronephrosis was present. At 3 months fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrograms were used to evaluate for the presence of VUR.

Results:

A total of 93 ureters were treated in 55 girls and 17 boys. All cases were considered to be complex as 17 had persistent reflux after open surgery (7 megaureters repairs, 2 extravesical repairs, 7 intravesical reimplants and 1 blind ureter), 11 had persistent reflux and neurogenic bladder, 7 had ectopic ureters to bladder neck, 6 had bilateral Hutch diverticulum, 6 had persistent stump reflux, 5 had ureterocele after puncture or incision, 15 had duplications, 1 had the prune belly syndrome, 2 had posterior urethral valve following resection, 1 had epispadias and 1 had urogenital sinus. The average maximum reflux grade was IV. An average of 1.1 cc (range 0.4 to 2) was injected per ureter. Of the patients 69 had 3-month followup results. The overall success rate was 68% after 1 implantation (47 of 69).

Conclusions:

Submucosal intraureteral implantation with Dx/HA corrected complex vesicoureteral reflux in 68% of patients. In all of these patients open surgery would have potentially been difficult. The use of fluoroscopy and/or guidewires is a useful adjunct in these cases. We believe that this minimally invasive approach is warranted as an initial step in the management of complex cases of VUR before resorting to more difficult open surgical procedures.

Key Words::  vesico-ureteral reflux , hyaluronic acid

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Papers Presented at Annual Meeting of the Section on Urology, American Academy of Pediatrics

PII: S0022-5347(05)61321-3

doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000139013.00908.1c

The Journal of Urology
Volume 172, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages 1614-1616, October 2004