Volume 172, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S42-S47, November 2004
PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DOUBLING TIME AS A SURROGATE END POINT FOR PROSTATE CANCER SPECIFIC MORTALITY FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OR RADIATION THERAPY
ABSTRACT
Purpose
A short posttreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA)-doubling time (DT) following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy was evaluated as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM).
Materials and Methods
Baseline, treatment and followup information was compiled on a cohort of 8,669 patients with prostate cancer treated with surgery (5,918) or radiation (2,751) from January 1, 1988 to January 1, 2002 for clinical stage T1c-4NxMo prostate cancer, forming the study cohort. Cox regression analysis was used to test whether Prentice criteria were violated in this cohort.
Results
After PSA defined recurrence PSA-DT less than 3 months and the specific value of PSA-DT at 3 months or greater were statistically significantly associated with time to PCSM and with time to all cause mortality after PSA defined recurrence (each Cox p <0.001). Treatment received was not statistically significant associated with time to PCSM following PSA defined recurrence in patients with PSA-DT less than 3 months (Cox p = 0.90) and in patients with PSA-DT 3 months or greater (Cox p = 0.28). Furthermore, after PSA defined recurrence PSA-DT less than 3 months was statistically significantly associated with PCSM (HR 19.6, 95% CI 12.5 to 30.9).
Conclusions
Posttreatment PSA-DT appears to be a surrogate end point for PCSM following surgery or radiation therapy. We recommend that consideration should be given to enrollment onto a clinical trial and/or initiating androgen suppression therapy at the time of PSA defined recurrence when PSA-DT is less than 3 months to delay the imminent sequelae of metastatic bone disease.
Key Words:: prostate , prostatic neoplasms , survival , prostate-specific antigen
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research funded by the United States Army Medical Research and Material Command, Fort Dietrick, Maryland and the Prostate Cancer Foundation, formally known as CaPCURE.The opinions and assertions herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of the United States Army or Department of Defense.
PII: S0022-5347(05)61307-9
doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000141845.99899.12
© 2004 American Urological Association, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
Volume 172, Issue 5, Supplement , Pages S42-S47, November 2004

