The Journal of Urology
Volume 174, Issue 1 , Pages 44-46, July 2005

THE ACCURACY OF 250 FINE NEEDLE BIOPSIES OF RENAL TUMORS

From the Department of Urology and the Institute of Pathology (WH), Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany

ABSTRACT 

Purpose:

In some cases of uncertain lesions in the kidney it would be helpful to perform biopsies for preoperative histopathological evaluation. In this study we evaluated the accuracy of and the impact on tumor management of core biopsy for histopathological evaluation of small solid renal masses.

Materials and Methods:

After radical or partial nephrectomy 250 renal tumor biopsies were performed in 50 patients. All biopsies were performed by 1 urologist after preparation of the kidney ex situ on back table visually guided. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsies were evaluated by 1 pathologist.

Results:

In 49 of 50 cases (98%) we could define the malignant behavior of the tumor when performing 1 central and 4 peripheral biopsies of each tumor. In 85.2% the grading was correctly defined. A benign lesion was revealed in 4 cases (8%, all oncocytoma). In renal tumors 4 cm or smaller in diameter the accuracy of 1 central and 1 peripheral biopsy each regarding definition of tumor origin, tumor grading and cell type/growth pattern was 96% and 95.5%, 84% and 84.4%, and 87.5% and 89.5%, respectively. In renal tumors more than 4 cm in diameter the accuracy was 100% and 98.1%, 85% and 94.3%, and 71.4% and 88.7%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Core biopsy of renal lesions is accurate enough for histopathological evaluation and determination of therapeutic procedure. Additionally, biopsy could be used for identifying benign renal lesion for observation.

Key Words::  carcinoma, renal cell , biopsy, needle

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Submitted for publication October 26, 2004.

PII: S0022-5347(05)60014-6

doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000162063.86400.de

The Journal of Urology
Volume 174, Issue 1 , Pages 44-46, July 2005