The Journal of Urology
Volume 174, Issue 1 , Pages 14-20, July 2005

UPDATE ON CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED BLADDER CANCER

  • JONATHAN E. ROSENBERG

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St., Box 1711, San Francisco, California 94115 (telephone: 415-353-7095; FAX: 415-353-7779).
    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Praecis Pharmaceuticals.
  • ,
  • PETER R. CARROLL

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with TAP Pharmaceuticals, National Institutes of Health, AstraZeneca and Imatrimus.
  • ,
  • ERIC J. SMALL

From the Departments of Medicine (Division of Hematology/Oncology) and Urology (PC), University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California

ABSTRACT 

Purpose:

Recent years have seen several advances in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer. We summarize the current state of the art for advanced bladder cancer treatment.

Materials and Methods:

A comprehensive review of published, prospective phase II/III clinical trials and retrospective analyses of patients with advanced bladder cancer was performed.

Results:

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic strategies around the time of radical cystectomy have been used to decrease the risk of subsequent metastatic disease. Although the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unproven, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a modest 5% to 6% absolute survival benefit in 2 meta-analyses of the available data. Chemoradiation is feasible and effective in some patients, allowing bladder preservation with an acceptable risk of progression. Randomized, phase III data comparing methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy to gemcitabine/cisplatin showed similar response proportions and overall survival with less toxicity in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm. This has led to the widespread use of gemcitabine/cisplatin as first line chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer. The optimal agents and regimens for second line chemotherapy remain undefined. Similarly biological and targeted therapies for advanced bladder cancer remain investigational.

Conclusions:

Combination cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy may benefit patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. Gemcitabine/cisplatin has replaced methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin as the regimen of choice in patients with good renal function. The optimal regimens for the medically unfit patient and second line chemotherapy remain undefined. The development of targeted therapies, less toxic regimens and improved cytotoxic agents are necessary to improve outcomes.

Key Words::  bladder , bladder neoplasms , drug therapy , cisplatin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Submitted for publication October 20, 2004.

PII: S0022-5347(05)60009-2

doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000162039.38023.5f

The Journal of Urology
Volume 174, Issue 1 , Pages 14-20, July 2005