The Journal of Urology
Volume 174, Issue 3 , Pages 959-962, September 2005

THE ANTERIOR ILEAL CONDUIT: RESULTS OF 100 CONSECUTIVE CASES

From the Department of Urology, Rho Hospital, Milano, Italy

ABSTRACT 

Purpose

The ileal conduit of Bricker is still widely used for urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder carcinoma. We have modified the standard technique with the aim of reducing the complication rate and facilitating treatment.

Materials and Methods

We leave the conduit in its natural isoperistaltic anterior position, the ureters are anastomosed in an anterior position on their own side, using a short ileum segment. The incision of the peritoneum is made in a particular manner to allow on its closure to extraperitonealize the anastomoses and the bottom of the conduit and to support and fasten the loop.

Results

A total of 100 consecutive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer had anterior ileal conduit. The complication rates were 5% temporary ureteroileal leakage, 1% reoperation rate, 5% long-term stenoses and 3% renal function deterioration. The surgical revision and the treatment of ureteroileal stenoses with anterograde percutaneous ureteral stenting were not complicated procedures. A comparison with conventional Bricker series shows a significant decrease in the complication rate.

Conclusions

The anterior ileal conduit reduces the technique complication rate and facilitates the treatment of complications, and it is a recommended operation for these reasons.

Key Words:  urinary diversion , cystectomy , complications

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Submitted for publication January 3, 2005.See Editorial on page 814.

PII: S0022-5347(01)68467-2

doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000170238.24275.5c

The Journal of Urology
Volume 174, Issue 3 , Pages 959-962, September 2005