The Journal of Urology
Volume 153, Issue 5 , Pages 1657-1659, May 1995

Functional Characteristics of the Reconstructed Neourethra After Island Flap Urethroplasty

From the Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Accepted 21 October 1994.

Abstract 

To test the neorethra objectively in cases judged to be clinical successes after transverse island flap hypospadias repair, we analyzed uroflowmetry data (peak flow, voided volume and ultrasonically determined post-void residuals) after repair. Patients were included if they were old enough to void volitionally and flow data were available after fistula or stricture repair. Flow data were then plotted on previously published age-dependent nomograms from normal controls.

Of 80 boys available for study 51 required no secondary procedures, 16 subsequently underwent fistula repair and 13 had strictures opened. After all primary and secondary procedures 55 patients (69 percent) had peak flows within the normal range and 25 (31 percent) had peak flows below the normal range. Of the 51 boys who never had fistulas and/or strictures 37 (73 percent) had normal flows while 18 of 29 (62 percent) who underwent fistula and/or stricture repairs had normal flows (p greater than 0.05). Residual volume was less than 10 percent of voided volume in 44 of the 51 boys who clinically had no problems postoperatively, in 8 of the 13 who had strictures opened and in 15 of the 16 who underwent fistula repairs. We conclude that the neourethra is functionally equivalent to a normal urethra in most boys after transverse flap urethroplasty. A majority of boys will have normal flow even after stricture or fistula repair.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Read at annual meeting of American Urological Association, San Francisco, California, May 14-19, 1994.

PII: S0022-5347(01)67496-2

The Journal of Urology
Volume 153, Issue 5 , Pages 1657-1659, May 1995