The Journal of Urology
Volume 156, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages 836-838 , August 1996

Outcome Analysis of the Modified Mathieu Hypospadias Repair: Comparison of Stented and Unstented Repairs

REFERENCES 

  1. Mathieu P . Traitment en un temps de I'hypospadias balanique ou juxtabalanique . J. Chir. . 1932;39:481
  2. Rabinowitz R . Outpatient catheterless modified Mathieu hypospadias repair . J. Urol. . 1987;138:1074
  3. McCormack M , Homsy Y , Laberge Y . “No stent, no diversion” Mathieu hypospadias repair . Canad. J. Surg. . 1993;36:152
  4. Wheeler RA , Malone PS , Griffiths DM , Burge DM . The Mathieu operation. Is a urethral stent mandatory? . Brit. J. Urol. . 1993;71:492
  5. Buson H , Smiley D , Reinberg Y , Gonzalez R . Distal hypospadias repair without stents: is it better? . J. Urol. . 1994;151:1059
  6. Zaontz MR . Nuances of hypospadias . Probl. Urol. . 1990;4:705
  7. Kass EJ , Bolong D . Single stage hypospadias reconstruction without fistula . J. Urol. . 1990;144:520

 The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of the United States Navy, Air Force or Department of Defense.

PII: S0022-5347(01)65834-8

The Journal of Urology
Volume 156, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages 836-838 , August 1996

Article Tools