The Journal of Urology
Volume 160, Issue 3, Part 1 , Pages 794-796 , September 1998

PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSED BY THE 5 REGION BIOPSY METHOD IS SIGNIFICANT DISEASE

,Accepted 3 April 1998.

REFERENCES 

  1. Hodge KK , McNeal JE , Terris MK , Stamey TA . Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate . J. Urol. . 1989;142:71
  2. Eskew LA , Bare RL , McCullough DL . Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate . J. Urol. . 1997;157:199
  3. Stamey TA . Editorial comment . J. Urol. . 1997;157:203
  4. Stamey TA , Freiha FS , McNeal JE , Redwine EA , Whittemore AS , Schmid HP . Localized prostate cancer: relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer . Cancer . 1993;71:993
  5. Carter HB , Savagoet J , Walsh PC , Epstein JI . Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate . J. Urol. . 1997;157:2206
  6. Peters-Gee JM , Miles BJ , Cerny JC , Gaba AR , Jacobsen G , Crissman JD . Prognostic significance of DNA quantitation in stage D1 prostate carcinoma with the use of image analysis . Cancer . 1992;70:1159
  7. Cintra ML , Billis A . Histologic grading of prostate adenocarcinoma: intraobserver reproducibility of the Mostofi, Gleason, and Bocking grading systems . Int. Urol. Nephrol. . 1991;23:449
  8. Epstein JI , Pizov G , Walsh PC . Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy . Cancer . 1993;71:3582

PII: S0022-5347(01)62789-7

The Journal of Urology
Volume 160, Issue 3, Part 1 , Pages 794-796 , September 1998

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution