Journal Home
Search for

Volume 175, Issue 2, Pages 678-682 (February 2006)


View previous. 117 of 161 View next.

Duplex Collecting System Diagnosed During the First 6 Years of Life After a First Urinary Tract Infection: A Study of 63 Children

Ekaterini SiomouaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Frederica Papadopouloub, Konstantinos D. Kolliosa, Andreas Photopoulosc, Eleni Evagelidoua, Philippos Androulakakisd, Antigoni Siamopouloua

Received 4 May 2005

Purpose

We determined the prevalence, anatomical variants and coexisting complications of duplex collecting systems in children with a history of UTI. Additionally, we compared the prevalence and severity of the coexisting anomalies with those found in single systems.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the records of children younger than 6 years who were evaluated following a first UTI during a 9-year period to identify those with duplex systems. Children without duplication anomalies comprised the control group.

Results

Of 774 evaluated children 63 (8%), more commonly females than males, had duplex systems. CDS were as common as IDS. VUR was the most commonly associated anomaly, with a higher prevalence in CDS (66%) and IDS (47%) compared to single systems (26%, p <0.0001 and p = 0.007, respectively). Ectopic ureterocele, which was the second most common associated anomaly, was found in 20% of the CDS but in none of the IDS or single systems. The occurrence of renal scarring was similar among CDS, IDS (13%) and single systems (10%). Poorly functioning pole moieties occurred more often in CDS (40%) compared to IDS (4%, p = 0.003), and were observed in none of the single systems. The resolution rate of reflux tended to be higher in IDS compared to CDS.

Conclusions

CDS were a common finding among children with UTI who had duplication anomalies. Although CDS and IDS were accompanied by VUR more often than were single systems, CDS were associated more often with severe VUR, other serious complications and poor renal function.

a Department of Pediatrics, Greece

b Department of Radiology, Greece

c Department of Nuclear Medicine, Greece

d University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina and Department of Pediatric Urology, “Aghia Sophia” Children’s Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Emmanouil Xanthou 58, GR-454 45 Ioannina, Greece (telephone: +302651097395; FAX: +302651097080)

PII: S0022-5347(05)00184-9

doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00184-9


View previous. 117 of 161 View next.