The Journal of Urology
Volume 176, Issue 2 , Pages 564-568, August 2006

Long-Term Outcome Following Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinical Stage T3 Prostate Cancer

  • Brett S. Carver

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, 353 East 68th St., New York, New York 10021 (telephone: 212-639-8266; FAX: 212-988-0759).
  • ,
  • Fernando J. Bianco Jr.
  • ,
  • Peter T. Scardino

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Steba Pharmaceuticals, Oncovance Inc., Merck, Sanofi Aventis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Prostate Cancer Foundation, AstraZeneca, Penguin Putnam Inc. and Nature Urology.
  • ,
  • James A. Eastham

      Affiliations

    • Financial interest and/or other relationship with Novartis.

Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

Received 15 August 2005

Purpose

We evaluated patients at our institution who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer to determine their long-term clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed our prospective surgical database and identified 176 men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer from 1983 to 2003. Clinical and pathological data were reviewed and evaluated in a Cox proportional hazards model to determine preoperative predictors of biochemical recurrence. Clinical progression following biochemical recurrence was evaluated and clinical failure was defined as the development of clinical metastases or progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Results

Of the 176 patients with cT3 prostate cancer 64 (36%) received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. At a mean followup of 6.4 years 84 (48%) patients had disease recurrence with a median time to biochemical recurrence of 4.6 years. The actuarial 10-year probability of freedom from recurrence was 44%. On multivariate analysis biopsy Gleason score, pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen and year of surgery were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was not a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence. Following biochemical recurrence clinical failure developed in 30 of 84 (36%) men with a median time of 11 years. Overall the 5, 10 and 15-year probabilities of death from prostate cancer were 6%, 15% and 24%, respectively.

Conclusions

More than half (52%) of our patients remained free of disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy. In our series neoadjuvant hormonal therapy offered no advantage with respect to disease recurrence. Radical prostatectomy remains an integral component in the treatment of select patients with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer.

Key Words:  prostate-specific antigen , recurrence , prostatectomy , prostatic neoplasms

Abbreviations and Acronyms:  BCR, biochemical recurrence , cT3, clinical stage T3 , NHT, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy , PSA, prostate specific antigen , RP, radical prostatectomy , RRP, radical retropubic prostatectomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 See Editorial on page 437.

PII: S0022-5347(06)00781-6

doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.093

Refers to article:

  • Radical Prostatectomy—Which Patients Benefit Most From Surgery?

    Joseph A. Smith
    The Journal of Urology August 2006 (Vol. 176, Issue 2, Page 437)

The Journal of Urology
Volume 176, Issue 2 , Pages 564-568, August 2006