The Journal of Urology
Volume 155, Issue 2 , Pages 703-706, February 1996

Satisfaction with Penile Appearance after Hypospadias Surgery: The Patient and Surgeon View

Departments of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Pediatric Urology, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Hospital Rotterdam, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dijkzigt Hospital, and Department of Endocrinology and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Accepted 23 June 1995.

Abstract 

Purpose

We studied the degree of agreement between hypospadias patient and surgeon satisfaction with the cosmetic surgical result, and the relation between penile length, meatal position and patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods

Cosmetic and functional results in 35 boys with hypospadias were assessed, and a standardized questionnaire was completed by patients and surgeon.

Results

There was hardly any agreement between patient and surgeon satisfaction with patient penile appearance. Patients were less satisfied than the surgeon. No significant correlation was noted between penile satisfaction and penile length. Patients with a retracted meatus were less satisfied with the meatal position than those with a glanular meatus. Of the 35 patients 4 underwent repeat surgery after our study.

Conclusions

Hypospadias surgeons should explicitly ask if patients are satisfied and they should follow patients through adolescence.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Sophia Foundation for Medical Research.

PII: S0022-5347(01)66504-2

The Journal of Urology
Volume 155, Issue 2 , Pages 703-706, February 1996